home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.princeton.edu!blume
- From: blume@zayin.cs.princeton.edu (Matthias Blume)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- Followup-To: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Date: 16 Feb 1996 15:45:36 GMT
- Organization: Princeton University
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <BLUME.96Feb16104536@zayin.cs.princeton.edu>
- References: <00001a73+00002504@msn.com> <4etcmm$lpd@nova.dimensional.com>
- <3114d8fb.5a455349@zesi.ruhr.de> <4f5h5t$f13@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
- <4g1bgf$l5@mailhub.scitec.com.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: zayin.cs.princeton.edu
- In-reply-to: ramsesy@rd.scitec.com.au's message of 16 Feb 1996 07:25:03 GMT
-
- In article <4g1bgf$l5@mailhub.scitec.com.au> ramsesy@rd.scitec.com.au (Ramses Youhana) writes:
-
- Another thing not mentioned is that Ada is far more complicated to learn
- fully than is C/C++.
-
- It is certainly harder than C, but I can't believe it is harder than
- C++. But then, there are many people who think they know C++, while
- in reality...
-
- --
- -Matthias
-